“My interest is to rather than continue with the psychoanalytic tilt which has tended to try to find the words – to find the areas of the analyst that has words to engage with these states and then help the patient transform these states into something thinkable and communicable. [In contrast] my interest has been to take the patient where they are; it’s kind of a radical way of saying ‘meeting the patient where they are’, and find our way and lend ourselves to engaging with them in their own idiom, using Bollas’s term, in their own way of being and to find ways to be with them that don’t necessarily rely on talking about things and making things known.”
Robert Grossmark, PhD
New York
Episode Description:
We begin by considering patient’s non-represented mental states and their manifestation in somatic and motoric registers. Robert describes his understanding and approach to clinically engage those who “barely experience continuity of the self or subjectivity in themselves or others.” He recommends ‘companioning’ with them. This entails not trying to “move the patient out of these regressed areas into greater relatedness …but to welcome these other dimensions and their full expression within the analytic space.” We consider the role of enactive engagements, the non-verbal vs the pre-verbal and ‘radical neutrality’. He presents a case where the patient and analyst shared music, food and not discussed emotional intimacy between them that he felt was vital to enable the patient to emerge as a ‘real person’. We close with speaking of Robert’s professional history of working early on with psychotic individuals and finding that his approach enabled them, often to their surprise, to feel heard. He also describes his attunement to the experience of being an ‘other’ that emerged from his growing up as an ‘other’ – a Jew in London.
Our Guest:
Robert Grossmark, Ph.D., ABPP, is a psychoanalyst in New York City. He works with individuals, groups, and couples. He is on the teaching and supervising faculty at the New York University Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis, The National Institute for the Psychotherapies Program in Adult Psychoanalysis, The National Training Program in Psychoanalysis, National Faculty Member, the Florida Psychoanalytic Center and lectures at other psychoanalytic institutes and clinical psychology training programs nationally and internationally. He is an Associate Editor for Psychoanalytic Dialogues. He is the author of The Unobtrusive Relational Analyst: Explorations in Psychoanalytic Companioning and co-edited The One and the Many: Relational Approaches to Group Psychotherapy and Heterosexual Masculinities: Contemporary Perspectives from Psychoanalytic Gender Theory.
Recommended Readings:
Grossmark, R. (2024) The Untelling, Psychoanalytic Dialogues. In press.
Grossmark, R. (2019) The anguish of fatherhood, Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 16 (3), 316-325.
Grossmark, R. (2023) A child is being murdered: A contemporary psychoanalytic treatment of a compulsion to child pornography, Psychoanalytic Psychology, 40: 25-30
Bach, S. (2011) Chimeras: Immunity, interpenetration and t he true self. Psychoanalytic Review, 98(1): 39-56
Winnicott, D. W. (1974). Fear of breakdown. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 1(1-2), 103–107.
Bollas, C. (2011) Character and interformality. In C. Bollas, The Christopher Bollas Reader (p. 238-248)
Ogden, T.O. (2017) Dreaming the analytic session: A clinical essay. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 86: 1-20.
Stern, D.B. (2022) On coming into possession of oneself: Witnessing and the formulation of experience. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 91: 639-667
Symington, N. (2012) The Essence of psychoanalysis as opposed to what is secondary. Psychoanalytic Dialogues. 22, 4, 395-409
Even though it wasn’t explicitly the focus of this particular episode, I feel that you might be talking about reactions to racism and antisemitism that is responsible for certain nonverbal, or preverbal states. This could be linked to childhood trauma; but, it’s interesting to note that childhood trauma comes usually from a known — not an “other.”